Next: 10. Future Work
Up: 4 Conclusion
Previous: 8. Conclusions
Contents
9. Contributions
Throughout this thesis we have tried to note our contributions. This
chapter is a short summary of all the contributions we mentioned, or
should have mentioned. Our major contributions include
- Novel LR fitting procedure which uses CG to find an
approximate solution the IRLS weighted linear least squares
subproblem. This improves speed and handles data with linear
dependencies.
- Demonstration of LR's suitability for data mining and
classification applications on high-dimensional datasets.
- Publically available high-performance implementation of our
IRLS algorithm, as well as the traditional CG-MLE. This software
includes the CG implementation we wrote to support our LR software.
Our CG implementation appears to be faster than the GNU Scientific
Library's implementation.
- In-depth survey of IRLS and CG-MLE modifications, along with
comprehensive empirical results.
In the course of our work, we also introduced a modification to the
Cholesky decomposition to overcome linear dependency problems,
described in Komarek and Moore [20]. However, LR methods using
this decomposition were inferior to our final approach.
Next: 10. Future Work
Up: 4 Conclusion
Previous: 8. Conclusions
Contents
Copyright 2004 Paul Komarek, komarek@cmu.edu